Clearly, the leaders of the main Western nations are
following a script given to them, which is the reason
Western Europe, North America and Australia in particular,
are self-destructing under the weight of 'human rights',
and 'equality' legislation, where reality is the opposite
of the rhetoric.
Gordon Brown, like his predecessor, has been given
the task of continuing to enslave the British people
by taking our rights and dumbing us down in the hope
that we do not notice and are unable to change things.
Mr Brown talks about the importance of 'Britishness,'
but his refusal to give us a referendum on the Lisbon
Treaty shows he is really concerned with throwing away
what is left of our sovereignty in the direction of
the EU, like you would throw the bones left on your
dinner plate to a dog.
With the Australian Prime Minister calling for an Asian
Union and a North
American Union already underway, we can see the
plan taking shape that will ultimately (or sooner than
we expect) create a One World Government.
Asian legal expert Prof Tim Lindsey of Melbourne University
has obviously studied the development of the European
Union. "With a union you have the idea of free trade,
and once you have that everything else follows," he
Sen. Karen Johnson, a fierce critic of the federal
government and a strong supporter of the memorial, believes
the Bush administration is trying to create the infrastructure
for a new regional North American government through
the Security and Prosperity Partnership. She wrote in
2006 that this is being accomplished in "stealth fashion,
under the radar and out of public view."
Like most of the Western World lately, mass-immigration
has been encouraged, including from all the countries
where Islamic terrorists are most likely to be living
As this recent US article entitled "Open
borders prove "War On Terror" is superficial"
"Another glaring inconsistency regarding the "war
on terror" is the fact that for some seven years since
the 9/11 attacks, our nation's borders and ports are
as open and porous as ever. These open borders make
the argument that "we are fighting them over there,
so we won't have to fight them over here" look absolutely
The reason I am writing this piece is because of Gordon
Brown's insistence that police should be allowed to
detain terror suspects for 42
days without charge.
Dozens of his own MPs are against the proposal as are
most other politicians, thus threatening defeat for
Labour in the Commons.
With the recent fiascos for Brown in last month's local
elections and the Crewe and Nantwich by-election and
with Labour's support at dangerously low levels and
the Party deep in debt, why is Mr Brown intending to
add to personal and corporate misery by pushing for
Is he under instructions? Who from, if he is the Prime
The danger is that justice in Britain is fast becoming
an alien notion and no longer based on natural justice
and our Judeo-Christian ways and so police and judges
are becoming increasingly confused as to what really
It means we live in a land where people with high moral
standards can get into trouble by promoting
Christianity, yet a 'high risk' paedophile
can walk free after a judge says his eleven-year-old
victim "welcomed sex."
I have posted articles about the current climate where
serious criminals are being ignored in order to use
resources to target people committing incredibly dubious
crimes or no crime at all (at least according to the
article, entitled, "Masked men caught on church
roof stealing lead... but that's not enough evidence,
say police," sums up the lack of justice and common
sense around today.
The truth is that we can no longer trust the 'authorities'
to be fair, honest, sensible and deliver righteous verdicts,
because standards have fallen so much.
The police have targets to meet, which the outgoing
chairman of the Police Federation has just condemned
for making matters worse.
The 'authorities' have warped political correct legislation
to enforce which has seen people in trouble for putting
the wrong items in the wrong bin or for selling golliwogs.
Have we been brainwashed into believing that golliwogs
Well, some African-American sisters have inaugurated
Doll Collectors Convention.
"Among Britt’s favorite dolls is her collections
of golliwogs — the century-old “black-faced” rag dolls
that are seen as racially offensive-caricatures to modern
But Britt says they created in childhood stories to
endear rather than offend.
“They are part of my history and I embrace them. You
have to learn from the past. You can’t hide from it,”
So I guess the agenda is to make a mountain out of
- well - nothing at all.
It is just something else whereby innocent people can
be harassed by 'officials' obeying orders from corrupt
bureaucrats and unthinking politicians who want us to
feel threatened continually.
Talking of governments' warped notions, Dr John Sentamu,
the Archbishop of York, has suggested
that the Government is "sacrificing liberty in
favour of an abused form of equality".
The Archbishop said human rights did not work without
a moral foundation, yet morality had been replaced by
consumer desires. He also warned against the growth
of 'diktat and bureaucracy' which he said interfered
with personal beliefs.
Last week, Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester
condemned Britain's 'broken' society and argued that
Christianity was the keystone of dignity, equality and
freedom and without it society would collapse.
Dr Sentamu's condemnation of human rights without religion,
and his decision to point the finger at Labour, came
in an address given to the Institute for Jewish Policy
He said: 'One of the many mantras of the New Labour
party of a decade ago was that of rights and responsibilities:
the idea that along with entitlement comes obligation.
'Unfortunately the combination of a rapacious consumerist
appetite with this mantra has led to a situation where
seemingly unfettered rights and entitlements have come
to the fore while responsibility has not simply gone
out of fashion but seems to have fallen off the radar.'
He added: 'Our current Government is in danger of sacrificing
liberty in favour of an abused form of equality - not
a meaningful equality that enables the excluded to be
brought into society, but rather an equality based on
diktat and bureaucracy, which overreaches into the realm
of personal conscience.'
Describing the interference with personal belief as
'petty minded', Dr Sentamu said: 'Human rights without
the safeguarding of a God reference tends to set up
rights which trump others' rights when the mood music
changes. Our society needs once more to rediscover the
compassion and service at the heart of religion.'
The Ugandan-born Archbishop said: 'The trumpet which
was once the herald of this nation's greatness was the
imperative of moral responsibility, where what was right
was informed by a faith-based understanding. 'Now we
are told that if we push for the end of religion in
the public arena, in our politics and the public square,
we will free ourselves from the shackles of an enslaving
and moribund moral responsibility.'
This, Dr Sentamu said, would mean morality would be
replaced by consumerism and the imperative not to do
the right thing but to buy the right thing.
So, who is pulling Gordon Brown's strings?
The 'son of the manse' who wants our Christianity and
its moral values, our sovereignty and our freedom dispensed
with, must be controlled by people with a vested interest
in this being achieved.
What Napoleon, Hitler and many others failed to do
by military might, the world's elites have learned they
can control the planet by stealth and technology.
The world's 'leaders' are just puppets in the charade
known as 'democracy.'