|
The war against families and children continues in
the House of Commons as MPs voted on Tuesday that fertility
clinics should no longer have to consider that a child
needs a father when giving a woman treatment.
Currently, single women may seek IVF treatment, but
if this new portion of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology
Bill becomes law, clinics will no longer be permitted
to deny access to lesbians and other single women who
want to deny their child his or her legitimate right
to a father.
Now all that will be required is a “need for supportive
parenting," but in the real world, this requires
parents of both sexes where possible.
I remember reading a comment left on the Daily Mail
website some months ago from a man who lost his 'beloved
father' when he was six or seven and said that deliberately
creating a child without a father was the same as intentionally
creating a disabled child.
Not only will the child be deprived of the love and
strength of a normal family life, but society will be
worse off also as numerous studies reveal.
Last year, convicted murderer, Garry Brotherston, who
turned to Christ while in prison and now visits schools
to warn on the danger of getting involved with knives,
visited a local church here and told of his experiences
'inside' and related that most of his fellow prisoners
in one of the jails he was incarcerated in, grew up
without their father at home, as did he.
He said that before Mothers' Day, the prisoners would
be busy making cards, but come Fathers' Day, not a single
card was posted.
They did not even know what a hug from a father figure
felt like.
This legislation will simply provide more human fodder
for the prison system.
Tragically for the Western world, the majority of politicians
have taken a bite from the venomous 'equality' serpent.
The poison of equal rights based on whims and fancies
and that disregards ethics, common decency, common sense
and the rights of others, especially children, has infected
the minds of those who decide the rules by which we
are meant to live.
The serpent's serum that produces hallucinations convincing
sufferers that diversity is good no matter what form
it takes and who it adversely affects has reversed the
polarity of many a top decision-maker's moral compass.
The only 'right' in the case in question is the right
for a child to have a father whenever possible.
The only diverse family situation acceptable in a civilised
society is one which lacks a parent only as the result
of an unavoidable event and not by design.
Even very young children are being brainwashed to consider
marriage as just another 'lifestyle choice' through
books such as can be borrowed from this 'charity' One
Parent Families Scotland.
Books include "Asha's Mums", where Asha's
lesbian family becomes an issue for her teacher and
classmates but for Asha it's no big deal. "A wonderful
book for 4 to 8 years old."
This article in the Guardian
says that it is argued that a pilot scheme giving such
books to four to eleven year olds is "necessary
to make homosexuality seem normal to children."
This is not about 'equality' but engineering society
to be broken down and made easier to control.
The Guardian article continues,
"Twenty years ago the publication of Jenny Lives
With Eric And Martin for use in schools led to an angry
public debate. In response the government passed Section
28, an amendment to the Local Government Act 1988, that
prevented local authorities and, by extension, schools
from 'promoting homosexuality' or its acceptability
as a 'pretended family relationship'. The amendment
was repealed in 2003 and this is the first large-scale
attempt to put similar books back into the curriculum.
Other books on the list of recommended texts for the
schools, which have not been named, include a story
about a spacegirl with two mothers and a baby penguin
with two fathers. If successful, the scheme will be
extended nationwide."
I remember the assurances we were given that the repeal
of Section 28 would not lead to homosexuality being
promoted in schools.
The danger just a few years ago was probably perceived
to be restricted to a handful of homosexual activists
in positions of trust as teachers trying to gain recruits
to their way of life.
The real danger is now very clear - it is primarily
the Government that is actively promoting homosexuality
as normal, even to four-year-olds.
The Guardian article mentions the "No Outsiders"
project whose website's
headline is "Researching Approaches to Sexualities
Equality in Primary Schools".
Children cannot be left just to be children, even in
primary schools. No, like the rest of society, they
have to have sex thrown at them at every opportunity,
at first sneakily and as time passes and parents have
been engineered to be more apathetic, more openly.
Checking the "No Outsiders" website you find
that one of the organisations "involved in the
planning of the project from the outset, and have representatives
on the project's Advisory Group" is Stonewall,
the homosexual rights group rabidly opposed to anyone
who disagrees with them.
The "No Outsiders" website tells us that
they are funded by The Economic and Social Research
Council (ESRC).
The ESRC is funded primarily through grant
in aid from the Office of Science and Innovation (OSI),
which is part of the Department of Trade and Industry
(DTI).
So the Government (via the DTI/OSI) is funding a research
council (ESRC) that in turn funds "No Outsiders"
that is aided "from the outset" by Stonewall
so as to give the Government the 'evidence' they require
to try and justify furthering their agenda of destroying
the family through promotion of unnatural human relationships
as equal to marriage.
The importance of this cannot be underestimated because
civilised and free society only thrives when families
grow straight and strong.
Is there something very wrong with me or should the
nation be rising up against this and swiftly dealing
with those responsible as child abusers and traitors,
depending on their role?
|
