I have been warning for years about
so-called 'sexual health' and 'safer sex' strategies
being immoral and damaging, often being ridiculed for
doing so. It is blindingly obvious that the powers-that-be
hate children and their potential, hate parents and
their authority and hate righteousness, goodness and
They say that sex sells but HM Government
has been selling sex to children for years as one means
of transferring power from parents to the state and
to get as many youngsters as possible monitored under
the 'sexual health' system.
Many of the dysfunctional adults who
have graduated from this 'anything goes' system live
their lives being scrutinised by health and social workers
and others who have 'authority' to feast on the deliberately
dumbed-down masses. This is an immense con being carried
out right under our noses to destroy families and communities
and aid the turning of our country into a police state.
Young women were once expected to "become
sexually active" only after their wedding day, or if
they did become pregnant while still single, the men
tended to 'do the decent thing' and get married.
Who rewrote the 'rules'?
Government and much of the media did
by denouncing and degrading family life and Christian
values, and turning right into wrong and vice versa
and depriving people of their self-worth, making them
feel like they are nothing more than sex objects and
consumers instead of encouraging them to be better,
happier and genuinely healthier people. And of course
the pharmaceutical industry and its influence that ensures
ever more drugs are available to try and rectify the
problems it and Government advisory groups nurturing
their own financial or political interests caused in
the first place.
I expect the Government soon to encourage
parents to allow their young daughters to be given the
HPV jab that protects against some strains
of the virus that causes cervical cancer. About right
for a sex-obsessed society that would rather see even
more profits for the pharmaceutical companies than the
encouragement of moral behaviour. Of course I don't
want to see a single woman dying of this but if it encourages
promiscuity and is not effective against all strains
of the virus, then what will the net result be? Perhaps
it will mean even more sexually-transmitted diseases
of all sorts.
I have seen Government-sponsored websites
aimed at youngsters complete with cartoon condoms and
stories of how an abortion is not so bad and reminding
children that they can seek medical advice behind their
Peter Hain's Northern Ireland Office
in 2006 looked at reducing the age of consent in the
province to 13. The news was broken by the Christian
Institute on 10th October in a press
release and was reported in the Belfast Telegraph.
"Children as young as 13 could legally
have sex with each other under radical plans being proposed
by the Northern Ireland Office. Teenage sex could be
legalised when there is no more than a 3 year age gap.
In these cases the age of consent is lowered to 13.
Other plans include repealing a law which bans sex in
public toilets and legalising 'mini brothels'. A public
consultation on the proposals ends on Friday." Christian
I knew it would happen. I had thought
that the criminally insane British Government would
have done it a bit differently by reducing the age of
consent to 14, and try to sell the idea by saying that
resources can then be diverted to help the under 14's
- you know - those that need protection most and what
with limited resources, because they care so much about
the little children.
My upcoming articles will put an end
to the misconception that our Government has children's
best interests at heart. Of course, because of "equality",
the proposals would also make it legal for 13 year olds
in the Province to sodomise each other, or a 16-year-old
(old enough to marry) to have sex with a 13-year old.
This is what our Government wants to promote, people.
Beware! Oppose it!! Imagine what they will propose next!!!
Actually, we do not need to imagine
it any longer: some damaged individuals in positions
of power want to teach five-year-olds
Labour MP, Chris Bryant, recently advocated
giving ten-year-olds explicit sex lessons and his
report backed sending these young children to sexual
health clinics for advice and contraception.
Mr. Bryant is a former vicar who posed
in his underpants for a homosexual dating website. Who
in his or her right mind gives someone like Mr. Bryant
the responsibility of compiling a report on the teaching
of sex to young children?
Everything the Government has tried
in so-called sexual health has failed. The members of
advisory bodies that help decide Government policy include
people from organisations whose existence is dependent
on providing advice and services relating to sexually-transmitted
diseases, contraception, abortion and dysfunctional
individuals and families.
It is interesting that the situation
in the Czech
Republic is almost as bad as it is in the UK and
their sex 'education' starts from the age of ten and
is also intended to reduce teenage pregnancy.
As I have said before and it is becoming
increasingly clear, sex is being encouraged to get young
people into the 'system' to be institutionalised and
to destroy families.
Have you noticed how STDs are now known
as STIs, i.e. infections, not diseases. It sounds better,
doesn't it, in the battle to promote sex?
Think about the agenda behind "sexual
health". The "authorities" are assuming control of our
children and depriving them of the real information
and failing to encourage the self-discipline that will
give them a far brighter, healthier future than filling
their minds with "safer sex" propaganda and their bodies
with toxins from contraceptives and partners with sexually-transmitted