A cross-party group of MPs has written a letter
to the Telegraph calling for the enforcement of
sexual health and 'relationships' education in all schools.
This means that children
as young as four could be started on compulsory
Come with me as I show you how people with their own
selfish agendas are manipulating the lives of our precious
Some appear to be grooming youngsters for a life of
homosexuality, while others are ensuring future users
of their sexual health "charities".
Of the ten MPs who signed the letter, the most well-known
to me and who represent the three parties are as follows
- and remember, these are the people who think they
know best how children should learn about sex and 'relationships':
1. For Labour: Chris Bryant. As
I reported a few months ago, Mr Bryant advocated
giving ten-year-olds explicit sex lessons and the report
he was responsible for backed sending these young children
to sexual health clinics for advice and contraception.
Mr. Bryant is a former vicar who posed
in his underpants for a homosexual dating website.
As I said at the time, "Who in his or her right
mind gives someone like Mr. Bryant the responsibility
of compiling a report on the teaching of sex to young
2. For the Conservatives: John Bercow. He went
from staunchly right wing to become much more of a liberal.
He did a personal U-turn and voted for reducing the
homosexual age of consent to 16. He urged the party
to become the champion of gay rights.
3. For the Lib Dems: Evan Harris. Known as Dr.
Death for his strong support of abortion and euthanasia,
Dr. Harris is an honorary vice president of the Gay
and Lesbian Humanist Association, whose website
“Human rights before religion!”
In other words, 'gay' rights before the rights of people
who practise a religion.
As I often end up saying, there is no such thing as
equality, just a hierarchy of ideologies.
What we seem to have is a group of liberals calling
for the Government to implement their ideas on sex education
- all three above are heavily supportive of 'gay rights'
and incidentally, all three voted this year against
reducing the abortion limit from 24 weeks. How they
must love children and value human life, eh?
At the end of their letter, before the signatures,
"We call on the Government to guarantee appropriate
sex and relationship education in every primary and
secondary school by putting personal, social and health
education on a statutory basis as part of the national
Judging by the people involved, the "relationship"
part of the "education" will presumably involve
the heavy promotion of homosexual behaviour as an acceptable
alternative to marriage.
Other than the ten MPs, there were two other signatories
on the letter:
Gill Frances Chair, Teenage Pregnancy Independent
Advisory Group. Look at the "advisors"
in this so-called "independent" group which
was set up in 2000 to advise the Government on the Teenage
Pregnancy Strategy and to monitor its implementation.
It seems to me that nigh on every one is expert in dishing
One of the Group is Simon Blake who is Chief Executive
of Brook, “the leading voluntary sector provider of
integrated sexual health services for young people across
the UK.” Their raison d’être is offering contraception
and abortion ’services.’ Without a conveyor belt of
dysfunctional people, their influence over the government
diminishes. Is it any wonder they lobby the government
to sell sex in primary schools under the pretence it
Andy Hamflett Chief Executive, UK Youth Parliament
London SW1. Last Winter, the UK Youth Parliament
was asked to play a leading role in the Government's
review of sex education. It supports removing a parent’s
right to withdraw their child from sex lessons.
The future of sex 'education' in British schools looks
to be as follows:
The 'basics' of sex will be taught to children beginning
at four years of age. There will be an incremental,
year-on-year, increase in this 'education' so that by
the time children become adolescents they will have
been brainwashed into believing that all that matters
is that they respect everyone's 'lifestyle choice' regarding
sexual behaviour and that 'taking precautions' is being
Contraception and abortion 'services' are already sometimes
on offer to twelve-year-old children and without their
I can foresee nothing emerging from state education
that will encourage children to be faithful, righteous,
have a sense of self-esteem and be empowered to think
for themselves and value their bodies as temples.
As a result, abortions and sexually-transmitted diseases
will rise and confused teenagers will be dragged into
homosexual lifestyles with the conditioning they have
received and the men in particular who will be ready
to pounce on them - homosexuals do not reproduce, so
they have to recruit.
comments in the Telegraph are worth reading as they
show how people have awakened to the tragic mess left
by the Government's programme of sex education.
Will parents rise up against this sick attack on childhood
or will they just sit back en masse and let a few dysfunctional
MPs and their 'advisors' with agendas ruin children's